The Effect of Ultrasonication and Delignification Treatment on the Sugar Released Value of Wood

Ika Wahyuni, Danang Sudarwoko Adi, Lucky Risanto, Fitria Fitria, Wahyu Dwianto, Sri Hartati, Rumi Kaida, Takahisa Hayashi

Abstract


The objective of these research was to study the impact of ultrasonication and delignification pretreatments in several wood species on their easiness for enzymatic hydrolysis, having the potential to be developed as the feedstocks for bioethanol production. Four different wood species from three botanical gardens in Indonesia have been selected, i.e., Gymnostoma sumatranum, Firmiana malayana, Pterocarpus indicus, and Alstonia scholaris, due to their higher sugar released values than a fast-grown tree, Sengon (Paraserianthes falcataria), when all were directly enzymatically hydrolyzed without pretreatment. The sugar released values after ultrasonication and enzymatic hydrolysis were between 3 – 5.5 mg/100 mg wood meal. When delignification pretreatment was performed, the sugar released values were higher than those with ultrasonication, ranging between 4 – 10.2 mg/100 mg wood meal. All the sugar released values after pretreatment were higher than those without pretreatment. Gymnostoma sumatranum was selected as the most potential wood species in this study due to its consistency among the species producing highest sugar released across different treatments. The SEM results showed that there was no significant changes in the morphological structure of the untreated fiber before and after enzymatic saccharification since it still had a complex structure due to the high lignin content. However, after the delignification treatment, the surface morphology of the fiber showed a decrease in the number of pits of the fiber, the surface residual of pits were reduced, parallel lines were more clearly visible, and the fiber structure was damaged with more small holes presented. The surface morphology of the fiber from the wood powder having delignification pretreatment supports the sugar released values which shows that the these values were higher than other treatments due to more recalcitrant substances were degraded, making it was easier for enzymes to break down cellulose. After ultrasonication, the SEM result showed less disrupted cell wall compared to after delignification which confirmed the higher sugar released data with delignification.


Keywords


bioethanol; delignification; enzymatic saccharification; pretreatment; sugar released; ultrasonication

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahlgren, P.A., Goring, D.A.I., 1971. Removal of wood components during chlorite delignification of black spruce. Canadian Journal of Chemistry. 49 (8), 1272-1275. https://doi.org/10.1139/v71-207.

Hackney JM, Atalla RH, VandeHart DL. 1994. Modification of crystallinity and crystalline structure of Acetobacter xylinum cellulose in the presence of water-soluble β-1,4-linked polysaccharides: 13C-NMR Evidence. Int J Biol Macromol 16: 215-218.

Hayashi T. 2009. Case study on bioethanol production in Riau. Paper presented at the 4th Humanosphere Science School, Riau.

Kaida R, Kaku T, Baba K, Oyadomari M, Watanabe T, Hartati S, Sudarmonowati E, Hayashi T. 2009. Enzymatic saccharification and ethanol production of Acacia mangium and Paraserianthes falcataria wood, and Elaesis guineensis trunk. J Wood Sci 55: 381-386.

Kumar, R., Hu, F., Hubbell, C.A., Ragauskas, A.J., Wyman, C.E., 2013. Comparison of laboratory delignification methods, their selectivity, and impacts on physiochemical characteristics of cellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol. 130, 372-81. 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.12.028.

Nityavardhana, S., Shrestha, P., Rasmussen, M. L, Lamsai, B. P., van Leuween, J. H., Khanal, S. K. 2010. Ultrasound improve ethanol fermentation from casava chips in cassava-based ethanol plants. Bioresouces Technology 101: 2741-2747.

O’Sullivan AC. 1997. Cellulose: The structure slowly unravels. Cellulose 4: 173-207.

Rehman, M. S. U., Kim, I., Chisti, Y., Han, J. 2013. Use of ultrasound in the production of bioethanol from lignocellulosic biomass. Energy Education Science and Technology Part A: Energy Science and Research 30(2): 1391-1410

Revin, V., Atykyan, N., Zakharkin, D., 2016. Enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation of ultradispersed wood particles after ultrasonic pretreatment. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology. 20, 14-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejbt.2015.11.007.

Sainz BM. 2009. Commercial cellulosic ethanol: the role of plant-expressed enzymes in vitro. Cell.Dev.Biol.-Plant 45:314-329.

Sanchez OJ, Cardona CA. 2008. Trends in biotechnological production of fuel ethanol from different feedstocks. Bioresource Technology 99: 5270-5295.

Subhedar, P. B., and Gogate, P. R. 2013. Intensification of Enzymatic Hydrolisis of Lignocellulose Using Ultrasound for Efficient Bioethanol Production: A Review. Industrial & Engineering Chemictry Research 52: 11816-11828.

Watanabe T. 2008. Biomass conversion. Paper Presented at the 1st Humanosphere Science School, Cibinong.

Zhu JY, Wang GS, Pan XJ, Gleisner R. 2009. Specific surface to evaluate the efficiencies of milling and pretreatment of wood for enzymatic saccharification. Chemical Engineering Science 64: 474-485.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.51850/wrj.2014.5.2.37-45

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Wood Research Journal

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Indexed by:

                       

 

Copyright ©Wood Research Journal  

    ISSN: 2087-3840,       EISSN: 2774-9320

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.